Pages

Thanks for visiting! If you like what you see here, subscribe to my RSS feed to receive updates.

Showing posts with label government spending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government spending. Show all posts

Friday, September 11, 2009

My First Blog Post on the Fr33 Agents Network

A new place I'm blogging at is the Fr33 Agents Network, which is a online group of Anarchists, libertarians, and others opposed to statism and dedicated to activism to promote liberty. My first piece was published today and concerns the relationship between poverty and Government policies. More specifically, it explores the ways the Government's harmful actions during economic downturns betray the claims of statists that the state is there to protect and aid those in the working class or poor communities. This is an excerpt:

With Friends Like These…
If you want to know whose side the Government is on just look at what they do during the bad times, and more importantly, who they do it to. In the current downturn, it didn’t take long for people to figure out the value of direct sales, either online (Ebay, Craigslist, etc.) or through yard sales, to earn extra money and/or acquire necessary things cheaply. Neither did it take long for the Government to announce that they would be cracking down on this newly blossoming marketplace which overwhelmingly benefits the everyday citizen. In truth, the Government is there to serve certain people...(continue)

So, you should head over to the Fr33 Agents Network to read the rest of this post and while there you should browse though some of the other authors' blog posts. I would also suggest you sign up for the Freedom Activist Network (F.A.N.), which is a social network associated with Fr33 Agents. There is a lot of discussion and organizing around anti-statist topics and activities by likeminded people.
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Could We Have Just Done Nothing?

The prevailing go-to response when the stimulus bill and the various bailouts are discussed is some variation of the contention that we "couldn't have just done nothing." My response has always been to point out that this is wrong on two counts:
  1. It assumes that the only two choices involved are doing the wrong thing or doing nothing, when there are many other things that could have been done instead of the one that involved spending a bunch of unnecessary money without actually addressing the underlying issues.
  2. If what is being proposed is only going to make the problem worse, then we actually would be better off doing nothing rather than just adding fuel to the fire.
As a matter of fact, last week the Washington Post reported that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has determined that the debt generated by the stimulus package will actually be harmful to the country's economy over time:
CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.

So, maybe we weren't beyond the point where we could have "just done nothing," after all.
Bookmark and Share